Kary Banks Mullis (b. December 28, 1944) is an American biochemist who
developed the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a central technique in molecular
biology which allows the amplification of specified DNA sequences, for which he
was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry and the Japan Prize in 1993. PCR
remains one of the most influential molecular techniques of our day, opening the
door to a wide variety of genetic and molecular research as well as applications
in medicine, forensics, paleontology and other fields. Mullis continues his
scientific work, but has more recently become known for idiosyncratic and
sometimes controversial views on topics unrelated to biochemistry.
Personal history
Mullis was born in Lenoir, North Carolina, and grew up in Columbia, South
Carolina where he attended Dreher High School. He attended the Georgia Institute
of Technology, and received a PhD in biochemistry from the University of
California, Berkeley in 1973. [1] He has been married four times (including his
current marriage), and has two sons and one daughter. He currently resides in
Newport Beach, California and in Anderson Valley, California.
Inventions
In 1983, while working for the biotechnology company Cetus, Mullis came up with
the idea of using the Thermophilus Aquaticus (taq) DNA polymerase to amplify
segments of DNA. DNA amplification existed prior to PCR, however the polymerases
used were destroyed when the DNA was melted (heated) and needed to be repeatedly
replaced. The taq polymerase was heat resistant and only needed to be added once
thus making the technique dramatically more cost effective. A more complete
story of the development of this technology can be found elsewhere in Wikipedia:
in an article on the source of the enzyme and an article on the history of the
technique. The importance of this invention and variations on it can hardly be
overstated. It has created revolutions in molecular biology, genetics, medicine
and forensics.
Some controversy surrounds the balance of credit that should be given to Mullis
versus the team at Cetus (see below); in practice, credit has accrued to both
the inventor and the company (although not its individual workers) in the form
of a Nobel Prize and a $10000 Cetus bonus for Mullis, and $300 million for Cetus
when the company sold the patent to Roche Molecular Systems.
Mullis has also invented a UV-sensitive plastic that changes color in response
to light, and most recently has been working on an approach for mobilizing the
immune system to neutralize invading pathogens and toxins, leading to the
formation of his current venture, Altermune LLC. In his Nobel page, he described
this idea this way:
It is a method using specific synthetic chemical linkers to divert an immune
response from its nominal target to something completely different which you
would right now like to be temporarily immune to. Let's say you just got exposed
to a new strain of the flu. You're already immune to alpha-1,3-galactosyl-galactose
bonds. All humans are. Why not divert a fraction of those antibodies to the
influenza strain you just picked up. A chemical linker synthesized with an alpha-1,3-gal-gal
bond on one end and a DNA aptamer devised to bind specifically to the strain of
influenza you have on the other end, will link anti-alpha-Gal antibodies to the
influenza virus and presto, you have fooled your immune system into attacking
the new virus.
This work is now being funded by DARPA.
Public controversies
Some of the principles of PCR were described in 1971 by Kjell Kleppe, a
Norwegian scientist, and some have asserted that Kleppe has a better claim to
the invention. In addition, the suggestion that Mullis was solely responsible
for the idea of using Taq polymerase in the PCR process has been refuted by his
co-workers at the time. Indeed, one story is that David Gelfand and Randy Saiki
at Cetus developed the idea of using a thermostable DNA polymerase, and that
Mullis was only recognized as an inventor after he came to the Cetus Labs
wielding a gun. The Kleppe story may best illustrate the fact that an invention,
even if has been conceptualized earlier, does not really exist until it can be
developed and realized.
The anthropologist Paul Rabinow wrote a book on the history of the PCR method in
1996 which questioned whether or not Mullis "invented" PCR or "merely" came up
with the concept of it. Rabinow, a Foucault scholar interested in issues of the
production of knowledge, used the topic to argue against the idea that
scientific discovery is the product of individual work, writing, "Committees and
science journalists like the idea of associating a unique idea with a unique
person, the lone genius. PCR is, in fact, one of the classic examples of
teamwork."
Mullis has also drawn controversy for his past association with Peter Duesberg
and his skepticism about the evidence for the idea that HIV causes AIDS. (For
more on this topic, see also AIDS reappraisal and the interviews listed below.)
As the recipient of a Nobel Prize for the PCR technique that is used to measure
viral load in people with AIDS, he has often been cited by people within the
AIDS dissident movement as someone who supports their views.
He also denigrates concern about global warming, denying that it is known to be
human caused, and disagrees with the idea that CFCs cause ozone depletion.
Mullis became known to a wider public as a potential forensic DNA analyst and
witness for the defense in the OJ Simpson trial. News coverage of Mullis, his
activities, and his background was extensive, and the defense moved to prevent
cross-examination about his personal life including "social relationships,
domestic discord and use of controlled substances." . However, evidently
satisfied that they had adequately discredited the DNA evidence without him, the
defense did not call him.
In Mullis's 1998 essay collection, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field, he relates a
number of experiences that some consider strange, and which critics point out to
question his scientific judgment. He also details his use of LSD. Perhaps the
strangest episode Mullis relates, he says, happened while at his cabin in the
remote northern California wilds; John Edward Mack noted that episode has many
hallmarks of the abduction phenomenon. Late one evening while walking to the
latrine, Mullis saw a "glowing raccoon" which spoke to him, saying "Good evening,
doctor." The next thing he remembered, several hours had seemingly passed
without his recall: it was dawn, and he was strolling on a path near the cabin.
His clothing was dry and clean, unlike what he'd expected from wandering the
forest in the dark of night for several hours.
Mullis later wrote, "I wouldn't try to publish a scientific paper about these
things, because I can't do any experiments. I can't make glowing raccoons appear.
I can't buy them from a scientific supply house to study. I can't cause myself
to be lost again for several hours. But I don't deny what happened. It's what
science calls anecdotal, because it only happened in a way that you can't
reproduce. But it happened."
The text is property of free encyclopedia Wikipedia. For more information please click here.